{"id":"CVE-2026-115359","aliases":[],"cve":{"records":[{"id":"CVE-2026-115359","source":"VulnCheck","state":"PUBLISHED","reasons":[],"replacements":[],"disputed":false,"unsupportedWhenAssigned":false,"reserved":"2026-10-22T11:21:20.778Z","published":"2026-10-22T19:13:34.716Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:54:37.275Z"}],"publishers":[{"name":"VulnCheck","role":"CNA","organizationId":"83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10","modified":"2026-10-22T19:13:34.716Z"},{"name":"CISA-ADP","role":"ADP","organizationId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","modified":"2026-10-29T11:54:37.275Z"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-5v22-543h-wg96","tags":["vendor-advisory"],"source":"VulnCheck"},{"url":"https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openbao-before-2.6.4-and-2.7.0-before-2.7.1-role-based-rate-limit-quota-bypass-via-request-parsing","tags":["third-party-advisory"],"source":"VulnCheck"}],"weaknesses":[{"id":"CWE-799","description":"Improper Control of Interaction Frequency","source":"VulnCheck"}],"applicability":[{"source":"VulnCheck","statements":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openbao:openbao:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"2.6.4"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openbao:openbao:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"2.7.0","versionEndExcluding":"2.7.1"}]}]}]}],"prioritization":[{"source":"CISA-ADP","type":"SSVC","role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-10-29T11:54:21.422511Z","decisions":[{"name":"Exploitation","value":"none"},{"name":"Automatable","value":"no"},{"name":"Technical Impact","value":"partial"}]}]},"title":"OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 Role-Based Rate Limit Quota Bypass via Request Parsing","titleSource":"VulnCheck","descriptionSource":"VulnCheck","description":"OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 contains a flaw in its rate limit quota subsystem where role resolution fails for requests with form-encoded bodies or forwarded certificates, so quota rules scoped to backend-specific roles are not enforced. Valid callers can repeatedly issue tokens without consuming the configured role-based rate limit budget.","score":6.3,"severity":"medium","published":"2026-10-22T19:13:34.716Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:54:37.275Z","withdrawn":false,"knownExploited":false,"affected":[],"products":[{"vendor":"openbao","name":"openbao","platforms":[],"versions":[{"version":"0","status":"affected","lessThan":"2.6.4","versionType":"semver"},{"version":"2.6.4","status":"unaffected","versionType":"semver"},{"version":"2.7.0","status":"affected","lessThan":"2.7.1","versionType":"semver"},{"version":"2.7.1","status":"unaffected","versionType":"semver"}],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","packageURL":"pkg:golang/github.com/openbao/openbao/v2","packageIdentity":{"ecosystem":"Go","name":"github.com/openbao/openbao/v2"},"cpes":[],"source":"VulnCheck","url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-115359"}],"remediation":[],"references":["https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-5v22-543h-wg96","https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openbao-before-2.6.4-and-2.7.0-before-2.7.1-role-based-rate-limit-quota-bypass-via-request-parsing"],"sources":[{"name":"CVE","id":"CVE-2026-115359","modified":"2026-10-29T11:54:37.275Z","url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-115359"}],"assessments":[{"source":"VulnCheck","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","score":6.3},{"source":"VulnCheck","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","score":3.7}],"sourceAffected":[],"observedAt":"2026-10-29T14:34:20.787Z","kev":{"status":"not-listed","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T05:35:31.277Z"},"coverage":[{"source":"NVD","status":"available","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.591Z","attemptedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.591Z"},{"source":"GHSA","status":"available","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.656Z","attemptedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.656Z"},{"source":"EUVD","status":"available","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.597Z","attemptedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.597Z"},{"source":"EPSS","status":"available","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.358Z","attemptedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.358Z"}],"evidence":[{"source":"FIRST EPSS","id":"CVE-2026-115359","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/","probability":0.00187,"percentile":0.08317,"date":"2026-10-28","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.358Z"},{"source":"NVD","id":"CVE-2026-115359","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115359","modified":"2026-10-23T14:20:57.920","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.591Z"},{"source":"NVD","id":"CVE-2026-115359","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115359","modified":"2026-10-23T14:20:57.920","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.591Z"},{"source":"ENISA EUVD","id":"EUVD-2026-108284","url":"https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/vulnerability/EUVD-2026-108284","modified":"Oct 22, 2026, 7:13:34 PM","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.597Z"},{"source":"GitHub Advisory Database","id":"GHSA-4pgx-x639-9642","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4pgx-x639-9642","modified":"2026-10-22T21:32:43Z","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T12:05:35.656Z"}],"aiSummary":{"text":"OpenBao versions before 2.6.4 and 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 have a flaw in rate limit quota subsystem, allowing valid callers to bypass role-based quotas. The weakness occurs due to failed role resolution for requests with form-encoded bodies or forwarded certificates. This may lead to repeated token issuance without consuming the configured rate limit budget.","model":"@cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast","generatedAt":"2026-10-30T09:37:53.410Z","sources":[{"name":"CVE","url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-115359"}]}}