Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
GHSA-p9wj-w8xq-vjx6

Loofah allowed_uri? treats javascript&#x3a alert(1) as safe

Products / packages flavorjones loofah · loofah

Published

Share

Severity and exploitation

Not in CISA KEVSource: MODERATE

KEV coverage does not rule out exploitation.

KEV checked 15/11/2026, 04:10:32 UTC
OSV · CVSS:4.0 · 5.3
Assessment vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
GitHub_M · CVSS:4.0 · 5.3
Assessment vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N
The headline uses the highest imported catalog score. Assessments can differ by source and CVSS version.

Severity

medium5.3

CVSS measures technical severity, not the likelihood of an attack.

Known exploitation

Not listed in the checked CISA KEV catalog

Absence from CISA KEV does not rule out attacks.

Public exploit

Not established by this record

Missing evidence does not mean no public exploit exists.

Remediation

Package fixes recorded

Fix versions are recorded for 1 of 1 mapped packages. Check each release branch and any separate product guidance.

What this means

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? returns true for a javascript: or vbscript: URI whose scheme is split by a numeric character reference without a trailing semicolon, followed by a character that allowed_uri? strips, such as a space or tab. A browser ends the reference at that character and reads javascript&x3a alert(1) as javascript: alert(1).

Source excerpt · OSV

Attack conditions

No attack-condition excerpt has been identified here. Review the full source description and references for authentication, network access, and configuration requirements.

Review supporting sources →

Affected versions

Check the exact model, release, and any platform requirements against your installation.

flavorjones · GitHub_M

loofah

1 range

Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.

affected

>= 2.25.0, < 2.25.3

unaffected

unknown

Other versions: unknown

Packages

Compare each installed version with the publisher’s affected ranges. Where a fix is recorded, choose the appropriate release branch and test compatibility before upgrading.

loofah RubyGems
Affected range Recorded fix
From 2.25.0 before 2.25.3Ecosystem versions2.25.3

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-p9wj-w8xq-vjx6

View original version evidence (3 explicit versions)

What to do

Compare your installed product and version with the affected versions above. A matching product name alone does not confirm exposure.

Use the recorded fix for your release branch. Review the publisher’s instructions and test compatibility before upgrading.

cve.new guidance unless attributed to a publisher. This page does not inspect your installation.

Public exploit evidence

No public exploit reference is identified in the imported evidence. This is not a claim that no exploit exists.

Original source description

Read the full publisher description

Summary

Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? returns true for a javascript: or vbscript: URI whose scheme is split by a numeric character reference without a trailing semicolon, followed by a character that allowed_uri? strips, such as a space or tab. A browser ends the reference at that character and reads javascript&#x3a alert(1) as javascript: alert(1).

Details

allowed_uri? strips control characters and whitespace before it decodes numeric character references. Removing the character that ends a semicolon-less reference lets the reference run on into the following text, so &#x3a alert decodes as &#x3aa (U+03AA) instead of a colon, and no scheme is detected. The same applies to decimal references and to references that encode a scheme letter, as in &#x6a\tavascript:alert(1).

Loofah's default sanitize() path is not affected, because Nokogiri decodes the entity during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI. This issue affects only callers of the public allowed_uri? string-level helper that pass it HTML-encoded strings.

Impact

Applications that validate a user-controlled URL with Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? and then render the approved value into an href or another browser-interpreted URI attribute may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting. Rails::HTML::Sanitizer.allowed_uri? re-exports the same helper.

Mitigation

Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.3.

Credit

Responsibly reported by GitHub user @manus-pi.

References

6 sources

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification
Additional publishers · not supplied

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

CVE-2026-126209

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

Underlying weaknesses

The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.

CWE-79 ↗

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

GitHub_M

Related →
CWE-184 ↗

CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs

GitHub_M

Related →
Contributing organizations · 1
GitHub_M

Assigning organization

2026-11-12

Timeline

All times UTC
  1. Advisory published

    Publication date supplied by the source.

  2. Source updated

    Latest modification date supplied by the source.

  3. Last imported by cve.new

    Latest catalog import, not the date we first saw this advisory.

What changed

Follow changes

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.