Loofah allowed_uri? treats javascript: alert(1) as safe
Severity and exploitation
KEV coverage does not rule out exploitation.
Assessment vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NAssessment vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NSeverity
medium5.3CVSS measures technical severity, not the likelihood of an attack.
Known exploitation
Not listed in the checked CISA KEV catalog
Absence from CISA KEV does not rule out attacks.
Public exploit
Not established by this record
Missing evidence does not mean no public exploit exists.
Remediation
Package fixes recorded
Fix versions are recorded for 1 of 1 mapped packages. Check each release branch and any separate product guidance.
What this means
Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? returns true for a javascript: or vbscript: URI whose scheme is split by a numeric character reference without a trailing semicolon, followed by a character that allowed_uri? strips, such as a space or tab. A browser ends the reference at that character and reads javascript&x3a alert(1) as javascript: alert(1).
Source excerpt · OSVAttack conditions
No attack-condition excerpt has been identified here. Review the full source description and references for authentication, network access, and configuration requirements.
Review supporting sources →Affected versions
Check the exact model, release, and any platform requirements against your installation.
flavorjones · GitHub_M
loofah
1 range
flavorjones · GitHub_M
loofah
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
affected
>= 2.25.0, < 2.25.3
Other versions: unknown
Packages
Compare each installed version with the publisher’s affected ranges. Where a fix is recorded, choose the appropriate release branch and test compatibility before upgrading.
| Affected range | Recorded fix |
|---|---|
| From 2.25.0 before 2.25.3Ecosystem versions | 2.25.3 |
Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-p9wj-w8xq-vjx6
View original version evidence (3 explicit versions)
What to do
Compare your installed product and version with the affected versions above. A matching product name alone does not confirm exposure.
Use the recorded fix for your release branch. Review the publisher’s instructions and test compatibility before upgrading.
cve.new guidance unless attributed to a publisher. This page does not inspect your installation.
Public exploit evidence
No public exploit reference is identified in the imported evidence. This is not a claim that no exploit exists.
Original source description
Read the full publisher description
Summary
Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? returns true for a javascript: or vbscript: URI whose scheme is split by a numeric character reference without a trailing semicolon, followed by a character that allowed_uri? strips, such as a space or tab. A browser ends the reference at that character and reads javascript: alert(1) as javascript: alert(1).
Details
allowed_uri? strips control characters and whitespace before it decodes numeric character references. Removing the character that ends a semicolon-less reference lets the reference run on into the following text, so : alert decodes as Ϊ (U+03AA) instead of a colon, and no scheme is detected. The same applies to decimal references and to references that encode a scheme letter, as in j\tavascript:alert(1).
Loofah's default sanitize() path is not affected, because Nokogiri decodes the entity during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI. This issue affects only callers of the public allowed_uri? string-level helper that pass it HTML-encoded strings.
Impact
Applications that validate a user-controlled URL with Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? and then render the approved value into an href or another browser-interpreted URI attribute may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting. Rails::HTML::Sanitizer.allowed_uri? re-exports the same helper.
Mitigation
Upgrade to Loofah >= 2.25.3.
Credit
Responsibly reported by GitHub user @manus-pi.
References
6 sourcesInside the record
Evidence available
Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.
Original records
CVE-2026-126209View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.
cve.new JSON →Underlying weaknesses
The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.
Contributing organizations · 1
Assigning organization
Timeline
All times UTCAdvisory published
Publication date supplied by the source.
Source updated
Latest modification date supplied by the source.
Last imported by cve.new
Latest catalog import, not the date we first saw this advisory.
What changed
Follow changesLarge field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.