Froxlor username/surname AND company field Bypass
Impact
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Source excerpt · OSVAffected packages
Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.
| Affected range | Recorded fix |
|---|---|
| Earlier releases before 2.1.2Ecosystem versions | 2.1.2 |
Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4
View original version evidence (80 explicit versions)
Original source description
Dear Sirs and Madams,
I would like to report a business logic error vulnerability that I discovered during my recent penetration test on Froxlor.
Specifically, I identified an issue where it was possible to submit the registration form with the essential fields, such as the username and password, left intentionally blank. This inadvertent omission allowed for a bypass of the mandatory field requirements established by the system.
The surname, family name AND company name all of them can be left blank.
I believe addressing this vulnerability is crucial to ensure the security and integrity of the Froxlor platform.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This action served as a means to bypass the mandatory field requirements.
Lets see (please have a look at the Video -> attachment).
as you can see i was able to let the username and second name blank.
Lets see again.
Only the company name is set.
Thank you for your time
References
- Security advisory github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-625g-fm5w-w7w4
- Security advisory nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50256
- Patch github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/commit/4b1846883d4828962add91bd844596d89a9c7cac
- Source reference github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor
- Source reference user-images.githubusercontent.com/80028768/289675319-81ae8ebe-1308-4ee3-bedb-43cdc40da474.mp4