GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Set up in your agent.

One prompt to get started. Paste it into your coding agent to connect cve.new through MCP and bring vulnerability context into your workflow.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Check your stack
GHSA-2hpc-mf4q-j885medium4.3No CVE assigned

Silverstripe CSRF vulnerability in GridFieldAddExistingAutocompleter

Impact

GridField does not have sufficient CSRF protection, meaning that in some cases users with CMS access can be tricked into posting unspecified data into the CMS from external websites. Amongst other default CMS interfaces, GridField is used for management of groups, users and permissions in the CMS.

Source excerpt · OSV

Affected packages

Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.

Affected rangeRecorded fix
Earlier releases before 3.1.17Ecosystem versions3.1.17
From 3.2.0 before 3.2.2Ecosystem versions3.2.2
From 3.3.0-beta1 before 3.3.0Ecosystem versions3.3.0

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-2hpc-mf4q-j885

View original version evidence (78 explicit versions)

Original source description

GridField does not have sufficient CSRF protection, meaning that in some cases users with CMS access can be tricked into posting unspecified data into the CMS from external websites. Amongst other default CMS interfaces, GridField is used for management of groups, users and permissions in the CMS.

The resolution for this issue is to ensure that all gridFieldAlterAction submissions are checked for the SecurityID token during submission.

References