GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Set up in your agent.

One prompt to get started. Paste it into your coding agent to connect cve.new through MCP and bring vulnerability context into your workflow.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

GIVE YOUR AGENT THE EVIDENCE

Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Check your stack
CVE-2026-99185unknown

firewire: core: fix race condition in split transaction handling

Impact

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Source excerpt · Linux

Affected packages

This source has no supported package-version data for matching. You can read the advisory here, but this record alone cannot power a dependency check.

Affected products

Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.

Linux · Linux

Other versions: unaffected

Version / rangeSource status
fa2dc27100768a8a994c377051fa17a47cc66c76 to before a8caee0e623ca5d56e829032f9ec073c09e4d224affected
fa2dc27100768a8a994c377051fa17a47cc66c76 to before 7f9f2d6abc40f79e802b4063859eda343043b85caffected
Linux version evidence

Linux · Linux

Other versions: affected

Version / rangeSource status
6.19affected
0 to before 6.19unaffected
7.2.13 through 7.2.* (inclusive)unaffected
7.3 through * (inclusive)unaffected
Linux version evidence

Original source description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

firewire: core: fix race condition in split transaction handling

For a split transaction, either fw_core_handle_response() or split_transaction_timeout_callback() may manipulate the same transaction entry in the pending transaction list. The return value of timer_delete() is used to determine which function handles the entry. If the transaction is a split transaction and timer_delete() returns zero, the timeout callback may already be running. In this case, the response handler must leave the entry in the list for the timeout callback to remove.

A previous code refactoring broke this behavior, introducing a race condition in which both functions could process the same transaction. This could lead to a use-after-free on the transaction initiator side.

Fix the regression by ensuring that the response handler does not process the transaction when timer_delete() returns zero. The timeout callback is responsible for removing the entry from the pending transaction list.

References