Image-customization-controller: unauthenticated plaintext image server with directory listing exposes ignition images containing cluster pull secret
Products / packages Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 · Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
Published
Severity and exploitation
KEV coverage does not rule out exploitation.
Assessment vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:NSeverity
high7.1CVSS measures technical severity, not the likelihood of an attack.
Known exploitation
Not listed in the checked CISA KEV catalog
Absence from CISA KEV does not rule out attacks.
Public exploit
Not established by this record
Missing evidence does not mean no public exploit exists.
Remediation
Source guidance available
Review the recorded instructions. Guidance may be a workaround rather than a fixed version.
What this means
The image-customization-controller in OpenShift's bare metal provisioning stack has an unauthenticated HTTP file server with directory listing, exposing ignition images containing cluster pull secrets. An adjacent network attacker can enumerate and download images, extracting the embedded Ignition config and recovering secrets. The affected product is Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 and 5.
Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.Attack conditions
No attack-condition excerpt has been identified here. Review the full source description and references for authentication, network access, and configuration requirements.
Review supporting sources →Affected versions
Check the exact model, release, and any platform requirements against your installation.
Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
0 ranges
Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
Other versions: affected
Product identifiers (CPE)
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
0 ranges
Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
Other versions: affected
Product identifiers (CPE)
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
0 ranges
Red Hat · redhat
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
Other versions: affected
Product identifiers (CPE)
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:5What to do
Compare your installed product and version with the affected versions above. A matching product name alone does not confirm exposure.
There is no way to disable the directory listing or add authentication without a code change. As a workaround, administrators can apply network-level controls to restrict access to port 8084 on the image-customization-controller pod to only the BMC/provisioning network hosts that require it. Use NetworkPolicy or firewall rules to block access from workload pods. Additionally, rotate any pull secrets and SSH keys that may have been exposed if unauthorized access to the provisioning network is suspected.
--- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-11-04) --- Disclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure.
The highest-value action is to enforce NetworkPolicy to restrict ingress traffic to port 8084 on the image-customization-controller pod, isolating the unauthenticated HTTP file server from cluster workloads: upgrade to the fixed Openshift4/Ose Image Customization Controller Rhel/Openshift5/Ose Image Customization Controller Rhel builds, which apply the documented input check, closing all 2 injection vectors (HTTP root directory listing enumeration, unauthenticated image retrieval and secret extraction). Until patched, this is a concern on OpenShift bare metal IPI clusters running the image-customization-controller, so Apply NetworkPolicy or firewall rules to restrict port 8084 access strictly to authorized BMC and provisioning network hosts, blocking workload pods from accessing the service. As a compensating measure, Rotate exposed cluster pull secrets and ramdisk SSH keys to limit their operational validity window if unauthorized provisioning network access is suspected. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying unauthenticated directory listing exposure defect — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate.
Highest-impact CME: CME-805 Credential Rotation Policy (medium)
cve.new guidance unless attributed to a publisher. This page does not inspect your installation.
Public exploit evidence
No public exploit reference is identified in the imported evidence. This is not a claim that no exploit exists.
Original source description
Read the full publisher description
A flaw was found in the image-customization-controller used in OpenShift's bare metal provisioning stack. The controller registers an HTTP file server on port 8084 with no authentication. The custom imageFileSystem implementation exposes a browsable HTML directory listing of all registered images at the root path. The only access control on per-host images is the random UUID filename; the directory listing discloses those UUIDs to any caller on the provisioning network. Each served image embeds an Ignition config containing the base64-encoded cluster pull secret, optional IRONIC_RAMDISK_SSH_KEY, proxy settings, and per-host NetworkManager keyfiles. An adjacent network attacker can enumerate all image UUIDs via directory listing, download any image, extract the embedded Ignition config, and recover the cluster pull secret and SSH key.
Evidence
pkg/imagehandler/imagefilesystem.go — root directory is browsable and enumerates all UUID image names
func (f *imageFileSystem) Readdir(n int) ([]fs.FileInfo, error) {
f.mu.Lock()
defer f.mu.Unlock()
result := []fs.FileInfo{}
for _, im := range f.images {
result = append(result, im)
}
return result, nil
}
func (f *imageFileSystem) Open(name string) (http.File, error) {
f.log.Info("Open", "path", name)
if name == "/" {
return f, nil
}
...
cmd/controller/main.go — file server bound on all interfaces without auth or TLS
http.Handle("/", http.FileServer(imageServer.FileSystem()))
go func() {
server := &http.Server{
Addr: imagesBindAddr, // default ":8084"
ReadHeaderTimeout: 5 * time.Second,
}
err := server.ListenAndServe()
pkg/ignition/service_config.go:94-100 — pull secret is embedded in every served image
func (b *ignitionBuilder) authFile() ignition_config_types_32.File {
source := "data:;base64," + strings.TrimSpace(b.ironicAgentPullSecret)
return ignition_config_types_32.File{
Node: ignition_config_types_32.Node{Path: "/etc/authfile.json"},
...
Attack Pattern
Adjacent provisioning-network client → GET / lists UUID image names → download ISO/initramfs → extract embedded Ignition → recover cluster pull secret and SSH key.
References
4 sourcesInside the record
Evidence available
Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.
Original records
CVE-2026-82976View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.
cve.new JSON →Underlying weaknesses
The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.
Contributing organizations · 1
Assigning organization
Timeline
All times UTCAdvisory published
Publication date supplied by the source.
Source updated
Latest modification date supplied by the source.
Last imported by cve.new
Latest catalog import, not the date we first saw this advisory.
What changed
Follow changes- CVE · CVE-2026-82976
Observed 2026-11-05T03:20:40.953Z · upstream updated 2026-11-05T02:19:12.537Z
Remediation guidance changed
before
[ { "text": "There is no way to disable the directory listing or add authentication without a code change. As a workaround, administrators can apply network-level controls to restrict access to port 8084 on the image-customization-controller pod to only the BMC/provisioning network hosts that require it. Use NetworkPolicy or firewall rules to block access from workload pods. Additionally, rotate any pull secrets and SSH keys that may have been exposed if unauthorized access to the provisioning network is suspected.", "source": "redhat", "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82976" } ]after
[ { "text": "There is no way to disable the directory listing or add authentication without a code change. As a workaround, administrators can apply network-level controls to restrict access to port 8084 on the image-customization-controller pod to only the BMC/provisioning network hosts that require it. Use NetworkPolicy or firewall rules to block access from workload pods. Additionally, rotate any pull secrets and SSH keys that may have been exposed if unauthorized access to the provisioning network is suspected.\n\n--- CME Mitigation Guidance (2026-11-04) ---\nDisclaimer: The following mitigation solutions are provided as a courtesy, pending the application of an official patch. This content was generated utilizing AI tools in conjunction with data from https://cmetaxonomy.org. Customers are advised to independently evaluate and test these temporary mitigations within their own infrastructure.\n\nThe highest-value action is to enforce NetworkPolicy to restrict ingress traffic to port 8084 on the image-customization-controller pod, isolating the unauthenticated HTTP file server from cluster workloads: upgrade to the fixed Openshift4/Ose Image Customization Controller Rhel/Openshift5/Ose Image Customization Controller Rhel builds, which apply the documented input check, closing all 2 injection vectors (HTTP root directory listing enumeration, unauthenticated image retrieval and secret extraction). Until patched, this is a concern on OpenShift bare metal IPI clusters running the image-customization-controller, so Apply NetworkPolicy or firewall rules to restrict port 8084 access strictly to authorized BMC and provisioning network hosts, blocking workload pods from accessing the service. As a compensating measure, Rotate exposed cluster pull secrets and ramdisk SSH keys to limit their operational validity window if unauthorized provisioning network access is suspected. These controls limit blast radius and contain exploitation, but they do not fix the underlying unauthenticated directory listing exposure defect — apply the upstream patch to fully remediate.\n\nHighest-impact CME: CME-805 Credential Rotation Policy (medium)", "source": "redhat", "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82976" } ]
Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.
Showing up to 50 most recent observed changes.