Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
CVE-2026-119187high7.5

Forge: Denial of service in TLS record processing via call stack exhaustion

Impact

The Forge library's TLS record processing is vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack via uncontrolled recursion, affecting versions prior to 1.4.1. An attacker can send a small chunk of records without authentication, causing the Node.js process to terminate.

Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.

Affected packages

Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.

Affected range Recorded fix
Earlier releases before 1.4.1Semantic versions1.4.1

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-hqq3-7jhf-c5jx

View original version evidence (0 explicit versions)

Affected products

Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.

digitalbazaar · GitHub_M

forge

1 range

Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.

affected

< 1.4.1

unaffected

unknown

Other versions: unknown

Original source description

Summary

Connections created with forge.tls.createConnection() processed received TLS records recursively, one stack level per record. A peer can send one chunk of thousands of small records, such as heartbeat records, which are accepted before the handshake, and process() throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded, which terminates Node.js processes that use the documented socket wiring. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1.

Details

In lib/tls.js, c.process() reads one record and passes it to _update(), which calls the handler for the record type from ctTable. Every handler (tls.handleHeartbeat, tls.handleApplicationData, tls.handleHandshake for fragmented messages, tls.handleHelloRequest and the other handshake handlers) ends by calling c.process() again to continue with the next buffered record, or the next message in the same record. Each record therefore adds process → _update → handler to the call stack. In Node.js 24, about 2,300 eight-byte records (under 20 KB) in one chunk are enough for process() to throw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded.

ctTable maps heartbeat records to tls.handleHeartbeat in every client and server state, so heartbeat records are processed before the handshake without any extension negotiation. The attack needs no authentication and no valid handshake messages. Both server connections (attacked by a client) and client connections (attacked by the server they connect to) are affected. Other record types recurse the same way: a handshake message fragmented over many records, many HelloRequest messages in one record, or many application data records after the handshake.

node-forge reports TLS protocol errors through the error callback, so applications do not normally wrap process() in try/catch. When process() is called from a Node.js socket data handler, as in the documented usage, the exception is uncaught and terminates the process. If the exception is caught, the connection is left partially processed and should be discarded.

No specification is violated; this is an implementation flaw (uncontrolled recursion).

The fix makes c.process() iterative. The record-reading code moves into _processRecord(), and c.process() runs it in a loop. A handler's call to c.process() without new data, made while records are being processed, now only flags that the loop should continue. Calls with new data are processed right away as before, so callback order and return values are unchanged.

Patches

Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. Records are now processed in a loop, so the stack depth no longer depends on the number of records.

Workarounds

Wrap every call to connection.process() in try/catch, and on an exception close the connection (connection.close()) and destroy the underlying socket. This prevents the process crash but not the loss of the attacked connection.

Credits

Reported jointly by Ziyue Wang, Chenchen, Strick Sheng, Liyi Zhou, and Maurice Ng.

Proof of concept

Input: one chunk of N identical heartbeat records, each 8 bytes:

18 03 01 00 03 01 00 00 (content type 24 = heartbeat, TLS 1.0, length 3, heartbeat_request with a 0-byte payload)

// c = forge.tls.createConnection({server: true, ...}) var rec = forge.util.hexToBytes('1803010003010000'); c.process(new Array(5001).join(rec)); // 5,000 records, 40,000 bytes

On 1.4.0 (Node.js 24), process() throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded after about 2,300 records, before any handshake. The same happens for a client connection. In a Node.js server that calls c.process(data.toString('binary')) from socket.on('data', ...), a client sending these 40,000 bytes terminates the server process. On 1.4.1 all records are processed and the server keeps running.

Regression tests in tests/unit/tls.js, "record processing": 50,000 heartbeat records in one call in server and client mode, a handshake message fragmented over 50,000 records, many HelloRequest messages per record, and checks that byte-by-byte input and exceptions from callbacks behave as before.

Impact

Applications that use node-forge's TLS implementation: connections from forge.tls.createConnection(), including those created by forge.tls.wrapSocket() and the forge.http / forge.xhr TLS connections, which call process() on received data. Any peer that can connect to a forge TLS server, or any server a forge TLS client connects to, can send a small chunk of records (under 20 KB) without authentication. In Node.js applications using the documented usage, the uncaught exception terminates the process, which drops every connection it serves; repeated chunks keep it down. In browsers the impact is limited to the attacked connection. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact.

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification
Additional publishers · not supplied

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

CVE-2026-119187

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

Underlying weaknesses

The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.

CWE-674 ↗

CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion

GitHub_M

Related →
Contributing organizations · 1
GitHub_M

Assigning organization

2026-10-29

What changed

Follow changes
No substantive changes have been recorded here yet. History starts when cve.new observes a change after tracking is enabled; earlier edits are not reconstructed.

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.

References

5 sources