Glob: AbortSignal cancellation bypass allows post-timeout filesystem traversal
Impact
In glob versions 9.0.0 to 13.0.6, an AbortSignal cancellation bypass allows post-timeout filesystem traversal, potentially causing significant filesystem I/O and CPU work after a request has timed out or been canceled. The issue affects both glob() and globStream() functions. This is an availability issue.
Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.Affected packages
Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.
| Affected range | Recorded fix |
|---|---|
| From 9.0.0 before 14.0.2Semantic versions | 14.0.2 |
Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4
View original version evidence (0 explicit versions)
Affected products
Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.
isaacs · GitHub_M
node-glob
1 range
isaacs · GitHub_M
node-glob
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
affected
>= 9.0.0, < 14.0.2
Other versions: unknown
Original source description
Summary
In glob 13.0.6, an aborted async walk rejects or emits an error but continues recursively reading directories in the background.
The root cause is that abort branches in src/walker.ts call cb() without returning. As a result, callers that rely on signal or AbortSignal.timeout() to bound glob traversal cost can still incur filesystem I/O and CPU work after the request has already been rejected.
Details
This was reproduced on glob v13.0.6 (commit e80cb38ae60d6cbff9e75f39032a994858994d35).
The README documents that the signal option cancels the glob walk. However, in src/walker.ts, the following methods call cb() when this.signal?.aborted is true but do not return:
- GlobUtil.walkCB()
- GlobUtil.walkCB2()
- GlobUtil.walkCBSync()
- GlobUtil.walkCB2Sync()
Example vulnerable pattern:
if (this.signal?.aborted) cb()
Because execution continues after cb(), the walker still reaches processor.processPatterns(), readdirCB(), and recursive walkCB2() calls.
The issue was directly demonstrated against v13.0.6. A source-history review shows the same missing-return pattern is present in tagged releases from v9.0.0 through v13.0.6.
The issue affects both glob() and globStream().
Recommended fix: Change each abort branch to return immediately:
if (this.signal?.aborted) return cb()
Proof of concept
Environment:
- Linux x86_64
- Node.js v22.23.3
- npm 10.9.9
- glob 13.0.6
Reproduction steps:
-
Install the affected package: npm init -y npm install glob@13.0.6
-
Run the attached PoC: node poc/abort-continues-work.mjs
The PoC aborts after the first readdir() call, waits briefly, and counts how many more directory reads happen after the promise has already rejected.
Observed output on the vulnerable version:
{ "rejection": "Error: probe-abort", "readdirCalls": 1365, "readdirCallsAtReject": 5, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 1360 }
Expected behavior: readdirCallsAfterReject should be 0.
A second PoC using AbortSignal.timeout() also reproduces the issue:
{ "rejection": "TimeoutError: The operation was aborted due to timeout", "readdirCalls": 133, "readdirCallsAtReject": 1, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 132 }
The same test against a patched build with return cb() in the four abort branches stops immediately:
{ "readdirCalls": 1, "readdirCallsAtReject": 1, "readdirCallsAfterReject": 0 }
Impact
This is an availability issue.
Applications that expose globbing over attacker-influenced patterns or attacker-controlled directory trees and use AbortSignal / AbortSignal.timeout() as a traversal budget can still perform significant filesystem I/O and CPU work after a request has already timed out or been canceled.
Repeated timed-out requests can stack background glob walks and degrade worker throughput or service availability.
No confidentiality or integrity impact was observed.
Inside the record
Evidence available
Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.
Original records
CVE-2026-118773View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.
cve.new JSON →Underlying weaknesses
The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.
Contributing organizations · 2
Assigning organization
Additional data publisher
What changed
Follow changes- CVE · CVE-2026-118773
Observed 2026-10-30T18:55:49.410Z · upstream updated 2026-10-30T17:12:23.906Z
Prioritization updated
before
[]
after
[ { "source": "CISA-ADP", "type": "SSVC", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2026-10-30T15:20:35.333742Z", "decisions": [ { "name": "Exploitation", "value": "none" }, { "name": "Automatable", "value": "no" }, { "name": "Technical Impact", "value": "partial" } ] } ]
Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.
Showing up to 50 most recent observed changes.