Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
CVE-2026-116794high8.3

russh: Agent server never calls `Agent::confirm`, so keys added with the confirm constraint (`ssh-add -c`) sign without confirmation

Impact

russh versions 0.50.0-beta.12 to 0.64.1 are affected by a vulnerability where the agent server never calls `Agent::confirm` before signing with a key that was added with the confirm constraint, allowing unauthorized use of the key. The private key itself is not exposed. The impact is unauthorized use of it for as long as the attacker can reach the agent.

Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.

Affected packages

Start with the recorded fix for your release branch. Check your installed version and test compatibility before upgrading. Fixing this advisory does not rule out other vulnerabilities in the release.

russh crates.io
Affected range Recorded fix
Earlier releases before 0.65Ecosystem versions0.65

Version evidence: OSV · GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv

View original version evidence (0 explicit versions)

Affected products

Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.

Eugeny · GitHub_M

russh

1 range

Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.

affected

< 0.65

unaffected

unknown

Other versions: unknown

Original source description

Summary

The agent server in russh::keys::agent::server never calls Agent::confirm before signing with a key that was added with the confirm constraint. That constraint is SSH_AGENT_CONSTRAIN_CONFIRM (RFC 9987 §5.2.7.2), which is what ssh-add -c sends.

The call was replaced by a hard-coded true in 3e04597 ("Native async traits encore", #455), first released in 0.50.0-beta.12. Every release since, up to and including 0.64.1, signs requests for confirm-constrained keys without asking the Agent implementation. A user who added a key with -c is therefore never asked to confirm.

Details

Connection::try_sign notes that the key needs confirmation, then awaits a ready future instead of the agent (server.rs L348-L360 at v0.64.1):

let agent = if needs_confirm {
    let (agent, ok) = {
        let _pk = key.clone();
        Box::new(futures::future::ready((agent, true)))
    }
    .await;
    if !ok {
        return Ok((agent, false));
    }
    agent
} else {
    agent
};

Before 3e04597 the first statement was let (agent, ok) = agent.confirm(key.clone()).await;.

try_sign was checked in the published crates on crates.io:

  • Every russh release from 0.50.0-beta.12 to 0.64.1 (52 versions) has the hard-coded true.
  • russh 0.50.0-beta.8 to beta.11 call agent.confirm.
  • Earlier russh releases have no agent server. It lived in russh-keys, and no russh-keys release is affected.

Not affected:

  • Agent implementations that keep the default confirm, which returns true anyway.
  • Checks made in Agent::confirm_request, which is still called with MessageType::Sign for every sign request (L158-L159).
  • The agent client, and the SSH client and server.

PoC

  1. Add this test to mod test in russh/src/keys/mod.rs. It uses the module's existing Incoming helper and ED25519_KEY.
  2. Run cargo test -p russh --lib keys::test::test_agent_confirms_keys_added_with_the_confirm_constraint.
#[tokio::test]
#[cfg(unix)]
async fn test_agent_confirms_keys_added_with_the_confirm_constraint() {
    use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};

    // An agent whose user refuses every confirmation prompt.
    #[derive(Clone)]
    struct Refuse(std::sync::Arc<AtomicUsize>);
    impl agent::server::Agent for Refuse {
        fn confirm(
            self,
            _: std::sync::Arc<PrivateKey>,
        ) -> Box<dyn Future<Output = (Self, bool)> + Send + Unpin> {
            self.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst);
            Box::new(futures::future::ready((self, false)))
        }
    }

    let prompts = std::sync::Arc::new(AtomicUsize::new(0));
    let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();
    let agent_path = dir.path().join("agent");
    let mut listener = tokio::net::UnixListener::bind(&agent_path).unwrap();
    let agent = Refuse(prompts.clone());
    tokio::spawn(async move {
        agent::server::serve(
            Incoming {
                listener: &mut listener,
            },
            agent,
        )
        .await
    });

    let key = decode_secret_key(ED25519_KEY, Some("blabla")).unwrap();
    let public = key.public_key().clone();
    let stream = tokio::net::UnixStream::connect(&agent_path).await.unwrap();
    let mut client = agent::client::AgentClient::connect(stream);
    // What `ssh-add -c` sends.
    client
        .add_identity(&key, &[agent::Constraint::Confirm])
        .await
        .unwrap();

    let signed = client
        .sign_request(&AgentIdentity::from(public), None, b"data".to_vec())
        .await;
    let confirm_calls = prompts.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
    assert!(
        signed.is_err(),
        "the agent signed with a confirm-constrained key without asking: \
         Agent::confirm was called {confirm_calls} time(s)"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        confirm_calls, 1,
        "Agent::confirm should be asked exactly once"
    );
}

On v0.64.1 (e5d80a0) the test fails:

the agent signed with a confirm-constrained key without asking: Agent::confirm was called 0 time(s)

With the fix below it passes, and so do all 46 keys:: tests.

Impact

A russh-based agent whose Agent::confirm asks the user, or applies any other check, signs every request for a confirm-constrained key without running that check. Anyone who can talk to the agent can then use the key without the user's approval:

  • other local processes of the user;
  • the remote host, when the agent is forwarded (ssh -A).

Preventing exactly this is the purpose of the confirm constraint. RFC 9987 §10 names it as what stops an attacker with access to the agent from "stealing use of those keys".

Because the agent accepts the constraint, ssh-add -c reports success and the user believes the key is protected. RFC 9987 §5.2.7 says an agent that does not support a constraint MUST refuse the key instead.

The private key itself is not exposed. The impact is unauthorized use of it for as long as the attacker can reach the agent: logging in to other hosts as the user, or signing data such as git commits.

Known affected downstream user (from its public code; not tested): Proton Pass desktop, which uses russh 0.62.7.

  • It adds every key with Constraint::Confirm (mod.rs L332).
  • It uses Agent::confirm as its "Pass is unlocked" check before signing, and defers MessageType::Sign from confirm_request to it (L75-L100). That check never runs.
  • Proton also removes keys from the agent on lock and logout (ssh-agent.middleware.ts L23-L27).

So the exposure there is limited to states in which keys stay loaded while Pass is not unlocked. Their own code notes, for example, that the agent persists across renderer reloads and account switches.

Suggested fix

--- a/russh/src/keys/agent/server.rs
+++ b/russh/src/keys/agent/server.rs
@@ -346,11 +346,7 @@ impl<S: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Unpin + 'static, A: Agent + Send + Sync
             }
         };
         let agent = if needs_confirm {
-            let (agent, ok) = {
-                let _pk = key.clone();
-                Box::new(futures::future::ready((agent, true)))
-            }
-            .await;
+            let (agent, ok) = agent.confirm(key.clone()).await;
             if !ok {
                 return Ok((agent, false));
             }

When confirm returns false, try_sign returns false and the agent answers SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, as it did before the regression.

Compatibility note for the release notes: confirm is called again for confirm-constrained keys, so implementations that stub it out will now hit that stub.

  • For example, Litterbox implements confirm as todo!() (agent.rs L81-L87).
  • Each connection runs in its own task, so such a panic ends only that connection.

Related but separate: with the default confirm, the agent still accepts the confirm constraint without enforcing it. Given RFC 9987 §5.2.7, refusing such keys when the application does not implement confirm may be worth considering.

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification
Additional publishers · not supplied

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

CVE-2026-116794

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

Underlying weaknesses

The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.

CWE-862 ↗

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

GitHub_M

Related →
Contributing organizations · 1
GitHub_M

Assigning organization

2026-10-28

What changed

Follow changes
No substantive changes have been recorded here yet. History starts when cve.new observes a change after tracking is enabled; earlier edits are not reconstructed.

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.

References

6 sources