Investigate in your agent.

Turn this advisory into a focused investigation. Ask your agent to check your project’s versions, explain the evidence, and suggest a compatible fix.

Your agent needs remote MCP support and access to https://cve.new/mcp.

Read the setup guide

Skip to content
Check your stack
CVE-2026-115477high7.1

obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP

Impact

obsidian-tc versions 1.13.0 to 1.31.4 are affected by a vulnerability where declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP, if the client echoes a validly bound requestState on resubmission. The server trusts the authentic call-bound state as proof of approval. A client under an attacker's control could execute destructive vault operations without human approval, requiring the caller's ordinary tool permissions.

Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.

Affected packages

This source has no supported package-version data for matching. You can read the advisory here, but this record alone cannot power a dependency check.

Affected products

Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.

The-40-Thieves · GitHub_M

obsidian-tc

1 range

Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.

affected

>= 1.13.0, < 1.31.4

unaffected

unknown

Other versions: unknown

Original source description

obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. From 1.13.0 until 1.31.4, on a Streamable HTTP deployment with auth.jwtSecret configured and a 2026-07-28-era client declaring elicitation.form support, a dispatch-gated tool call offered an inputRequired confirmation could still complete after the human declined or cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound requestState on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval even though that state was minted before the elicitation/create leg was asked and proved only that the resubmission belonged to the same call. A client behaving incorrectly or under an attacker's control could therefore execute dispatch-gated destructive vault operations without the human's approval, while still requiring the caller's ordinary tool permissions. Only tools marked destructive: true or requiring a scope with a human-in-the-loop floor were reachable through this bypass. The sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools, including write_note overwrite and move_note, did not read elicitation state on the modern wire and let neither approval nor decline through that path. Affected deployments using stdio or leaving auth.jwtSecret unset instead used the CLI elicit_token fallback and did not offer this requestState round trip. The fix does not prevent a malicious client from reporting a fabricated approval, because the server cannot verify that the client displayed the form or that a human saw it. This issue is fixed in version 1.31.4.

Inside the record

Evidence available

Package identity · not supplied
Version evidence
Remediation guidance · not supplied
Weakness classification
Additional publishers

Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.

Original records

CVE-2026-115477

View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.

cve.new JSON →

Underlying weaknesses

The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.

CWE-285 ↗

CWE-285: Improper Authorization

GitHub_M

Related →
CWE-863 ↗

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

GitHub_M

Related →
Contributing organizations · 2
GitHub_M

Assigning organization

2026-10-23
CISA-ADP

Additional data publisher

2026-10-29

What changed

Follow changes
No substantive changes have been recorded here yet. History starts when cve.new observes a change after tracking is enabled; earlier edits are not reconstructed.

Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.

References

6 sources