Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities
Impact
IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements. The weakness is described as improper control of generation of code.
Summarized by @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast. Verify details against the original sources.What to do
IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.12.4. https://pypi.org/project/langflow/1.12.4/
For Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 - 1.12.3, follow the Prepare to upgrade instructions and release-specific configuration changes https://docs.langflow.org/release-notes , including backing up your existing installation, then follow the Langflow OSS installation instructions https://docs.langflow.org/get-started-installation to install version 1.12.4 and test your flows.
Affected packages
Affected products
Vendor version evidence. Product records are separate from automatic dependency matching.
IBM · ibm
Langflow OSS
1 range
IBM · ibm
Langflow OSS
Compare with this publisher’s ranges. This does not inspect your installation.
affected
1.0.0 → through 1.12.3
semver versions
Other versions: unknown
Product identifiers (CPE)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.12.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*Original source description
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code.
Inside the record
Evidence available
Describes the evidence in this view, not whether the product is safe.
Original records
CVE-2026-101288View the latest unmodified CVE JSON from the official source. It may be newer than this imported page.
cve.new JSON →Underlying weaknesses
The source’s classification of what caused the vulnerability.
Contributing organizations · 2
Assigning organization
Additional data publisher
What changed
Follow changes- CVE · CVE-2026-101288
Observed 2026-10-30T19:25:42.416Z · upstream updated 2026-10-30T17:18:26.636Z
Prioritization updated
before
[ { "source": "CISA-ADP", "type": "SSVC", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2026-10-29T00:00:00+00:00", "decisions": [ { "name": "Exploitation", "value": "none" }, { "name": "Automatable", "value": "no" }, { "name": "Technical Impact", "value": "total" } ] } ]after
[ { "source": "CISA-ADP", "type": "SSVC", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2026-10-30T03:56:30.294890Z", "decisions": [ { "name": "Exploitation", "value": "none" }, { "name": "Automatable", "value": "no" }, { "name": "Technical Impact", "value": "total" } ] } ] - CVE · CVE-2026-101288
Observed 2026-10-30T04:19:58.347Z · upstream updated 2026-10-30T03:56:29.734Z
Prioritization updated
before
[]
after
[ { "source": "CISA-ADP", "type": "SSVC", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "timestamp": "2026-10-29T00:00:00+00:00", "decisions": [ { "name": "Exploitation", "value": "none" }, { "name": "Automatable", "value": "no" }, { "name": "Technical Impact", "value": "total" } ] } ]
Large field values are marked as truncated previews. Original source snapshots remain retained.
Showing up to 50 most recent observed changes.